Petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petition. The court granted the request with liberty to avail other remedies as prayed for, thereby disposing of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail of remedy if available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp10788.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10788 OF 2016
Narayan s/o Sahankarao Surwashe (Surywanshi) & another .. PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. R.P. Bhumkar, advocate for petitioners. Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 29th NOVEMBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail of remedy, if available in law. Leave granted with liberty as prayed for. Writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
( SANGITRAO S. PATIL ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Narayan s/o Sahankarao Surwashe (Surywanshi)
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
