Dismissed
Ram Kumar Chaubey v. the Chief Secretary Government of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/1012/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sjs
913-WP-1012.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1012 OF 2014
Ram Kumar Chaubey …. Petitioner Vs. The Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra & Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. M.S. Karnik with Mr. Sahil Mahajan i/by Mr. Aditya Pratap for the Petitioner. Ms P.H. Kantharia, GP, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. H.C. Pimple for Respondent No.4. Mr. C.M. Lokesh for Respondent No.6. Ms Kiran Bagalia for Respondent No.7. Mr. Y.S. Nankani with Mr. Paresh Patkar i/by Mulla & Mulla for Respondent No.8. Mr. Piyush Raheja with Mr. Sanmish Gala i/by M. Gandhi & Co. for Respondent No.9. Mr. Arif Bookwala, Senior Counsel with Mr. Shrikant V. Doijode, Ms Rashne Mulla-Feroze & Ms Geetanjali Joshi i/b Doijode Associates for Respondent No.10. Mr. Varun Mamniya i/b Economic Law Practice for Respondent No.11.
CORAM: D.H. WAGHELA, C.J. AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : 1ST MARCH, 2016
P.C:
sjs
913-WP-1012.2014.doc
liberty to the petitioner to take alternative appropriate remedy.
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
(SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Ram Kumar Chaubey
The Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra
D.H. WAGHELA
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court