Mr. Murugaperumal Thiraviam v. Mr. a. Thiraviam Nadar
Bombay HCTP/220/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
TP-10-14-RULE-435-COMMON.DOC
¶2
SHEPHALI
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
COMMON CONDITIONAL ORDER FROM
SERIAL NOS. 1 TO 440, EXCEPT
SERIAL NOS. 22, 76, 173, 181, 268 &
942 ON THE SUPPLEMENTARY BOARD
¶4
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:2nd May 2016
¶5
PC:-
¶6
1.In all these matters, office objections, if any, are to be
removed on or before 24th June 2016, with no possibility of any
extension. This includes payment of Court fees, if any. In default,
the Petitions will stand dismissed without further reference to the
Court.
¶7
2.It is clarified that the Department is not to dismiss any matter
for non-removal of office objections where any Caveat has already
been filed. The Department is, therefore, required to check on a
case by case basis whether any Caveat is filed or not. This will also
apply in cases where Caveat has been filed but has been dismissed,
and there is a Notice of Motion or Chamber Summons filed for
restoration of the Caveat or a condonation of delay.
¶8
Page 1 of 2
2 May 2016
¶9
TP-10-14-RULE-435-COMMON.DOC
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Shelihara
Coram
AI extract
G.S. Patel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court