Disposed

1. Kamaladevi Sambhunath Pathak and Ors. v. Jaimurat Ramanand Pathak

Bombay HC29 Apr 2016TP/131/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a testamentary petition where the court extended time to remove office objections till 20th May 2016 due to administrative delays, warning of dismissal on non-compliance. The court noted that no further extension would be granted.

What did the court decide?

Time extended till 20th May 2016 to remove office objections; dismissal without further reference warned on non-compliance.

1. Kamaladevi Sambhunath Pathak and Ors. Vs… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

P4-TP131-12.DOC

¶2

ATUL

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 131 OF 2012

¶4

Jaimurat Ramanand Pathak…Deceased
And
Kamaladevi Sanbhunath Pathak & Others…Petitioners

¶5

Mr. P.M. Khankar, for the Petitioners.

¶6

CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:29th April 2016

¶7

PC:-

¶8

1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.

¶9

2.The office objections were directed to be removed by 29th
April 2016 by an order dated 11th April 2016. It is pointed out by Mr.
Khankar in his praecipe that for no fault of his the matter was
assigned to at least three different officers for various reasons. The
last assignment was to Mrs. Gulekar only a few days ago and the
work could not be completed in time. It is only on account of these
exceptional circumstances that the time for removing office
objections is finally extended till 20th May 2016. There will be no
further extension. On non-compliance by the extended date, the
Petition will stand dismissed without further reference to the Court,
and will not be restored thereafter.

¶10

Page 1 of 2

¶11

29 April 2016

¶12

P4-TP131-12.DOC

¶13

3. Registry is directed to give priority to this matter acting on an authenticated copy of this order.

¶14

4.Mr. Khankar agrees not to move the learned Vacation Judge
for an extension under any circumstances.

¶15

(G. S. PATEL, J.)

¶16

Page 2 of 2
29 April 2016

1. Kamaladevi Sambhunath Pathak and Ors. v. Jaimurat Ramanand Pathak

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

1. Kamaladevi Sambhunath Pathak and Ors. v. Jaimurat Ramanand Pathak

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Geeta Mohan Narayan Vs Smt. Vasantha Narayan and Uma Narayan (Applicant)

Rajesh Salgaonkar Vs Lavoo Vasudev Revankar.....Deceased

Shri Surji @ Suresh Khimji Satra Vs Hansraj @ Husmukh Khimji Satra

M/S. Shemaroo Entertainment Ltd. Vs Information Tv Pvt.Ltd. and 2 Ors.

Nishant Rajaram Wadvalkar Vs Vedant Nishant Wadvalkar (Minor)

Pidilite Industries Limited Vs Jyoti Resins and Adhesives Limited