Rajesh Ramanlal Shah v. Pradeep Shah and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court heard a summary suit based on dishonoured cheques alleging a loan. Noting conflicting pleas regarding the year of cheque issue and the existence of a loan versus recoupment of share trading losses, the Court held that triable issues exist requiring evidence. The judgment grants leave to defend unconditionally.
What did the court decide?
Defendants are granted unconditional leave to defend the suit.
What the court decided
48.sj.36.2015.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 36 OF 2015 IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 264 OF 2015
Rajesh Ramanlal Shah ...Plaintiff vs Pradeep Shah & Anr ...Defendants
Mr Simi Purohit a/w Sharmili Mhatre i/b Rohit Shetty for the Plaintiff Ms Sunanda Kumbhat for Defendant No.1 in SS 322 of 2015 and for Defendant Nos.1 and 2 in SS No. 264 of 2015.
Ms Shama Mulla for Defendant No.2 in SS No.322 of 2015 and for Defendant No.3 in SS No.264 of 2015.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
JANUARY 27, 2016
P.C. :
The Summary Suit is based on dishonoured cheques. The consideration for these cheques is stated to be a loan of Rs.2.5 Crores given by the Plaintiff to Defendant No.3 at the instance of Defendant No.1. It is the Plaintiff's case that this loan was given in February 2012; that in May 2012 Defendant No.1 executed Department Promissory Note and in June 2012 gave six cheques aggregating to Rs.2 Crores to the Plaintiff, towards repayment of this loan. The cheques were dishonoured when presented for payment, whereupon statutory notice was issued under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and a criminal case was filed. This case is pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate's Court at Girgaon in Mumbai. The Summary Suit seeks recovery of this amount.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether triable issues regarding the nature and validity of the loan and cheque transactions require evidence to be led at trial before an implication of bad faith.
Whether the defendants are entitled to unconditional leave to defend the summary suit.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
Pradeep Shah
- respondent
Anr
Coram
S.C. Gupte
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court