Review petition was dismissed with consequent discharge of Notice of Motion, citing no appearance by petitioner and lack of grounds for review.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
RPL/5/2014 WITH NM56/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 5 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2551 OF 1999 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.56 OF 2014 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 5 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2551 OF 1999
Maharashtra Veez Kamgar Mahasangh …. Petitioner.
V/s
Maharashtra State Electricity Board and Others ….. Respondents.
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. M.S. Topkar for Respondent No.2. Mr. P.P. Chavan alongwith Mr. Nirav Shah, Mr. Anuj Jaiswal i/b Little & Co. for Respondent No.6.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE & M.S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE: 9th February, 2016 (In Chamber at 2.35 P.M.)
P.C.:-
2/2
RPL/5/2014 WITH NM56/2014
Petition and secondly after having perused the Petition, we are of the view that even otherwise no case is made out for reviewing our own order. Moreover, the order has been passed on merits and therefore if the Petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, it will have to approach the Apex Court. Review Petition is therefore dismissed.
(M.S. SONAK, J.)
(V.M. KANADE, J.)
BDPPS
Maharashtra Veez Kamgar Mahasangh
Maharashtra State Electricity Board
V. M. KANADE
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
