Dismissed
Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi v. State of Maharashtra and 3 Other
Bombay HCRPW/49/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2016 Vat IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
RPWL 47 of 2016
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (WRIT PETITION) (L) NO. 47 OF 2016 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 96 OF 2015
Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Rakesh Agrawal for the Petitioner Ms. Trupti Puranik for Repsondent -BMC Mr. Hemant Haryan for Respondent No.1 Mr. Shyam Gopal i/b. Veritas Legal for Respondent No.4
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 5, 2016
P.C. :
In view of the reply filed by the Corporation, we are of the view
that no case is made out for reviewing the order dated 26th August, 2016.
Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi
State of Maharashtra
BMC
V. M. Kanade
Nutan D. Sardessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court