Saliquddin Zaiuddin Chisti v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Court rejected review application challenging order refusing transfer of investigation from police to CBI/CID. Court found applicant's claim of assault was not supported by initial medical report which recorded road traffic accident.
What did the court decide?
Prayers for calling record for further offences and transferring investigation to independent agency rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 398 OF 2015
Saliquddin Zaiuddin Chisti,
Age : 45 years, Occu. Business,
R/o Khultabad, Bazar Galli,APPLICANT
Tq. Khultabad, Dist. Aurangabad(Ori. Informant)
VERSUS
1. The State of Maharashtra
2. The Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad
3. The Superintendent of Police (Rural), T.V. Centre, Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad
4. The Police Inspector, Chavani (Cantonment) Police Station, Aurangabad, Tq. and Dist. Aurangabad
5. Sharfuddin Mohammad Ramzani, Age : 50 years, Occu. Business
6. Shabbir Ahemad Amiroddin, Age : 60 years, Occu. Pensioner
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether further investigation into road traffic injuries can be transferred to an independent agency after criminal writ petition was rejected.
Whether the original informant's assertion of assault is supported by contemporaneous medical evidence.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Saliquddin Zaiuddin Chisti
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
S.S. SHINDE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court