Vithal Eknath Bade Vs the Executive Engineer Maharashtra Water Utilization Project Division Division No 2 Ahmednagar

The applicant/ employee, who has already been regularized in service as a Mustering Assistant, has moved this application for seeking review of the order dated 21/07/2016 by which he was deprived of back wages.

¶10

Mr.Upadhye, learned Advocate has drawn my attention to the grounds for review (A to H) in support of his contention that back wages should have been granted and since the applicant was not in employment, he cannot be deprived of the back wages.

¶11

Having considered the submissions of Mr.Upadhye and the grounds cited, it needs mention that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Lily Thomas Vs. Union of India, [AIR 2000 SC 1650] has

¶12

khs/DEC.2016/207-d

¶13

2

¶14

concluded that a review application cannot be canvassed as if an appeal is being presented, in as much as, the grounds raised cannot be canvassed as if the writ petition, which is decided, is being reargued.

¶15

I have observed in paragraph No.13 of the order that the applicant was working on Employment Guarantee Scheme. He would have no right to seek regular work or reinstatement, though the respondent/establishment has already reinstated him and granted him permanency. In the backdrop of the observations in paragraph No.13, I had deprived the applicant of back wages.

¶16

I do not find that the applicant has made out any ground which would indicate an error apparent on the face of the order calling for a review.

¶17

In the light of the above, this review application, being devoid of merit, is rejected.

¶18

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶19

khs/DEC.2016/207-d

Vithal Eknath Bade v. the Executive Engineer Maharashtra Water Utilization Project Division Division No 2 Ahmednagar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vithal Eknath Bade v. the Executive Engineer Maharashtra Water Utilization Project Division Division No 2 Ahmednagar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhule Agrilcultural Produce Market Committee. Vs Dnyaneshwar Gangaram Shendage and Others.

Dhule Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Vs Ganesh D.Fulpagare and Others.

Dhule Agril.Produce Market Committee and Another. Vs Bhagwan Laxman Deware and Others.

Rajendra Narayan Pawar Vs Msrtc through Its Divisional Controller and Anothers

Jivan Bhujangrao Bharti Vs M S R T C Beed and Ors.

Nana Barku Gaikwad Vs Collector, Aurangabad and Others