PIL seeking reconstruction bhatta dismissed for want of prosecution as the office noting shows it was not paid.
PIL dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
PIL 69 of 2007
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTERST LITIGATION No. 69 OF 2007
Sanjay Ratan Bhakta ….Petitioner vs. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation & Anr. ….Respondents
None for Petitioner Ms. G.R.Shastri – AGP for the State
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 21, 2016
P.C. :
The office noting shows that the reconstruction bhatta is not
paid. Hence PIL is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.
V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
Sanjay Ratan Bhakta
The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation
V. M. KANADE
Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
