The Public Interest Litigation No. 24 of 2014 was disposed of without further order as the PIL did not survive based on a previous order dated 23rd August, 2016, referencing paragraph 3.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL. 24-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 24 OF 2014
Anita Anil Chavan … Petitioner Vs. Commissioner of Police & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Ramesh Dube-Patil, for the Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Nair i/b S. K. Nair, for the Respondent No. 5.
Mr. Virag Tulzapurkar, Sr. Counsel a/w Pravin Samdani, Sr. Counsel a/w Nitesh Ranavat i/b M/s. Wadia Ghandy & Co., for Respondent No. 4.
Ms. Geeta R. Shastri, Addl. G. P. for Respondent Nos. 2 & 8. Ms. Trupti Puranik, for the Respondent – BMC.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 6, 2016 PC.
. In our view, PIL itself has worked out, and in view of what is mentioned in our order dated 23rd August, 2016, more particularly in paragraph 3, PIL does not survive. PIL is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/Sd/[Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Anita Anil Chavan
Commissioner of Police & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
