The Court dismissed PIL No.4 of 2002 for non-prosecution after an amendment order was not complied with. Writ Petition No.469 of 2002 was placed before an appropriate Bench.
PIL No.4 of 2002 dismissed; WP No.469 of 2002 placed before appropriate Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil-4.02.odt
pmw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.4 OF 2002 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.469 OF 2002
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. Sujay H. Gangal for the Petitioner in WP/469/2002.
Mr. A.B. Vagyani, Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in PIL/4/2002 and for Respondent No.1 in WP/469/2002. Mr. Rajdeep S. Khadapkar for the Respondent No.3 in PIL/4/2002.
Ms. M.D. Mondkar i/by Mr. S.B. Shetye for Respondent No.3 in WP/469/2002.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & R.D. DHANUKA, JJ.
DATE : 6th SEPTEMBER, 2016
P.C.
1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether PIL No.4 of 2002 should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of amendment.
Whether Writ Petition No.469 of 2002 should be referred to an appropriate Bench.
Public Interest Litigation
Writ Petition
Respondents 1 and 2
Respondent No.3
A.S. Oka
R.D. Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court