The petition was disposed of as a PIL since specific aggrieved persons alleged illegalities by the Leelavati Awhad Institute of Technology were reserved the right to file an appropriate petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
PILST/14740/15
BDPPS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (ST) NO.14740 OF 2015
Rajendrapratap Ramjit Singh
...Petitioner.
V/s
The Vice Chancellor, University of Mumbai & Ors … Respondents
Mr. Rohit Pande for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE &
MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATE: 18th August, 2016
P.C.:-
We are of the view that if any persons are aggrieved by the illegalities committed by Leelavati Awhad Institute of Technology, they are at liberty to approach this Court by filing appropriate Petition. On this ground alone, we are not inclined to entertain this Petition as PIL. Reserving the right of such aggrieved persons, Petition is disposed of.
(MRS SWAPNA JOSHI, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
Rajendrapratap Ramjit Singh
The Vice Chancellor, University of Mumbai & Ors
V. M. Kanade
Mrs. Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
