Dismissed
Juhu Citzens Welfare Group and 2 Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and 14 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/146/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2006 Vat IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/3
PIL 146 of 2006
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTERST LITIGATION No. 146 OF 2006
Juhu Citizens Welfare Group and Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Shyam Panchmukh i/b. Kran Bhalerao & Co. for Petitioners Ms. G.R. Shastri – AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, 6 and 8 Mr. Milind Sathe, Senior Counsel a/w. Pinakin Modi i/b. M/s. Parimal K. Shroff & Co. for Respondent No.11
Mr. Adhip Iyer i/b. AZB & Partners for Respondent No.12
Mr. Birendra Saraf a/w. Mr. Aziz Khan a/w. Shradha Achliya a/w. Raksha Thakkar i/b. Divya Shah and Associates for Respondent Nos. 13 and 14.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 21, 2016
P.C. :
2/3
PIL 146 of 2006
3/3
PIL 146 of 2006
party.
Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
Juhu Citizens Welfare Group and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
V. M. Kanade
Ms. Nutan D. Sardessai
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court