Disposed
Rajendra Bhausaheb Gondkar and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCPIL/129/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
PIL 129/16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.129/2016
Rajendra S/o Bhausaheb Gondkar & another.
..Petitioners..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
..Respondents..
.....
Shri U.R.Awate, Advocate for petitioners.
Smt.V.N.Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 3 & 5.
Shri N.R.Bhavar,Advocate of Respondent No.6.
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 25.11.2016
ORDER :
1] Present PIL is filed seeking writ of quo-warranto against the respondent no.7. Mr.Awate, learned counsel submits that now the respondent no.7 has resigned from the said post and is no longer working on the said post.
2]In view of above statement, the relief claimed in
the PIL does not survive and as such the PIL is disposed
of.
3] As the relief claimed has become infructuous , the amount deposited by the petitioners be refunded back to the petitioners.
ndk/ c25111630.doc
Rajendra S/o Bhausaheb Gondkar & another
The State of Maharashtra & others
S.V. Gangapurwala
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court