with costs of Rs.5000/- to each of the Applicants. The order of the Industrial Court directing such payment is challenged both by the Petitioners herein as well as the Applicants in their own writ petition, namely, Writ Petition No.1873 of 2013, whereas it is the grievance of the present Petitioners that the Industrial Court ought not to have directed closure compensation to the Applicants as of 1 July 2002, that being the date of closure, the case of the Applicants in their own petition is that the Industrial Court ought to have considered that there was no legal closure and ought to have directed the Petitioners herein to pay full wages upto the date of any future legal closure. That is the subject matter of the controversy in the Applicants' own petition. However, as far as the present order of the court is concerned, namely, order dated 3 October 2013 passed in the present petition, it simply requires the Petitioners to deposit the amount in accordance with the impugned order. The Petitioners have already paid / deposited amount of full wages in respect of both the Applicants. So also the Petitioners have paid closure compensation calculated at the rate of Rs.8145/being the last drawn salary and for 16 years of completed service in case of Applicant No.2 and at the rate of Rs.3950/- per month for 14 completed years of service in case of Applicant No.1. The Petitioners have also deposited costs of Rs.5000/- each in the case of both the Applicants. The Petitioners are not liable to deposit any further amount in this court in pursuance of the order of the Industrial Court. Accordingly, there is no merit in the notice of motion and the same is dismissed. No order as to costs.
