Disposed

Pramila Sumansingh Thakur v. State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Bombay HC20 Apr 2016NMW/329/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This notice of motion petition sought action against illegally constructed structures in Mumbai. The petitioners did not file a reply, and the Corporation did not file one. The court directed the Assistant Commissioner to treat the petition as a representation and act expeditiously within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Assistant Commissioner to treat the petition as a representation and take action within 12 weeks.

Pramila Sumansingh Thakur Vs State of Maharashtra… — Municipal and Town Planning | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

NMW.329/2013-WP.11/2013(957)

¶2

¶3

mnm

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 329 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11 OF 2013

¶6

Pramila Sumansingh Thakur	...Applicant/Orig.Petitioner
In the Matter between :
Pramila Sumansingh Thakur Vs.	...Petitioner
State of Maharashtra & Ors.	...Respondents

¶7

Ms. Pramila S. Thakur, Petitioner in person present Ms. Shobha Ajitkumar for the Respondent BMC Mr. Kunal Chheda i/b. M.V. Kini & Co., for Respondent No.4

¶8

CORAM : V.M.KANADE & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 20^TH APRIL, 2016

¶9

P.C. :

¶10

The grievance of the Petitioner is that the Corporation is not taking any action against those structures which are illegally constructed. No reply has been filed by the Corporation.

¶11

We direct the Assistant Commissioner, G-North Ward of Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to treat

¶12

2 NMW.329/2013-WP.11/2013(957)

¶13

this Petition as the representation of the Petitioner and to take action in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, if possible within a period of 12 weeks.

¶14

With these directions the Notice of Motion as well as the Petition are disposed of with liberty to apply.

¶15

(M.S. KARNIK, J.)

¶16

(V.M.KANADE, J.)

Pramila Sumansingh Thakur v. State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramila Sumansingh Thakur v. State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Siddhisai Co-Operative Housing Society (Proposed) Vs the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Shri Shankar Bhikaji Somwanshi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mr. Sopan M. Shepal Vs Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation, through Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Nooruddin Ismail Qureshi Vs the State of Maharashtra and 8 Ors.

Pramila Sumansingh Thakur Vs State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Forbes and Company Limited Vs Urvesh Psyllium Industires Ltd. and Ors.