Disposed
Bernice Ronald Miranda v. Mrs. J. H. Baptisia and Anr. and Savio Miranda and 4 Ors.(Pro.Respondents)
Bombay HCNMT/59/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
920-NMT-59-2016.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.59 OF 2016
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.80 OF 2000
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.1335 OF 1999
Bernice Roland Miranda… Petitioner
Versus
Joyce H. Baptista & Anr....Respondents
And
Savio Miranda & Ors.… Proposed
Respondents
Ms. Rupali T. Pandit, i/b. E. Gonsalves for the Petitioner.
Mr. Arun Panicker, for the Defendant No.1.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J.
DATED:7th April 2016
P.C.
1.For the reasons set out in the Affidavit in Support, the
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.The Affidavits of Evidence of the Plaintiff and attesting
witnesses are to be filed in the Registry and served on the
Advocates for the Defendants on or before 13th April 2016.
1 of 2
920-NMT-59-2016.DOC
3. List the Suit for marking the Plaintiffs documents on 2nd May 2016.
4. The Notice of Motion is disposed of in these terms with no order as to costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Bernice Roland Miranda
Joyce H. Baptista
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court