Shaheeda Pravin v. Kanchan Manishlala and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in this testamentary suit notice of motion, restored a defendant's caveat to file. The court granted the plaintiff a single final deadline to file evidence affidavits and documents, warning that default would lead to dismissal for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Caveat restored to file; Plaintiff given until October 14, 2016, to file Evidence Affidavits and Compilation of Documents; no extension of time granted.
What the court decided
15-NMT-168-2016.DOC
VIKRANT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 168 OF 2016
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 85 OF 2000
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1194 OF 1998
Swati Surana Née Swati Manish Lala...Applicant
In the matter of
Shaheeda Parvin…Plaintiff
Versus
Kanchan Manish Lala and Another…Defendants
Mr. Vivek Sharma , for the Applicant/Defendant. Mr. S.D. Mulye , for the Plaintiff.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the caveat filed by the defendant should be restored to file after being dismissed for non-appearance.
Whether the plaintiff should be given a final opportunity to file evidence affidavits and documents.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Swati Surana Née Swati Manish Lala
Coram
G.S. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court