Single judge order in a testamentary jurisdiction matter where the applicant admitted defaults in a Notice of Motion and sought restoration of a chamber summons which had been rejected earlier.
The Notice of Motion is made absolute to restore Chamber Summons (L) No. 127 of 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-NMT158-15.DOC
SHEPHALI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 158 OF 2015
IN
CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 127 OF 2015
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1652 OF 2013
Rajesh R. Kulkarni & Another...Petitioners
Versus
Ratnakar Kulkarni…Applicant
Mr. G. S. Hiranandani , for the Applicant. Ms Aditi Bhansali , i/b Bharucha & Partners, for the Petitioners.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:29th August 2016
PC:-
1.Mr. Hiranandani for the Applicant states with quite alarming
though refreshing contour that all the defaults in this Notice of
Motion are on his part.
2.The Notice of Motion seeks to restore the Chamber
Summons (L) No. 127 of 2015. That Chamber Summons was
rejected for non-removal of office objections. Hence, this Notice of
Motion.
Page 1 of 2
29th August 2016
23-NMT158-15.DOC
3.The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a).
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
29th August 2016
Rajesh R. Kulkarni & Another
Ratnakar Kulkarni
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court