Tukaram Raghunath Kerkar v. Praful Khanderao Deshmukh and Anr. and Asmi Developers (Developers)
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-NMT137-16.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 137 OF 2016
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 650 OF 2005
Tukaram Raghunath Kerkar…Petitioner
Versus
Praful Khanderao Deshmukh…Caveator
And
M/s. Asmi Developers...Respondent
Mr. S.R. Ingule, i/b Mr. S.G. Walam, for the Petitioner/Applicant.
Mr. Sunny Yadav, i/b V.K. Damle, for the Caveator.
Mr. Viraj Maniar, i/b Maniar Srivastava & Associates, for the
Respondent, Developer.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 18th August 2016
PC:-
1.On instructions, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks
leave to withdraw the Notice of Motion with liberty to adopt
appropriate proceedings. Leave granted with liberty as prayed.
2.The Notice of Motion is disposed of in these terms with no
order as to costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
18th August 2016
Tukaram Raghunath Kerkar
M/s. Asmi Developers
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court