Allowed

Perviz Nariman Hathidaroo and Anr. v. Roda Rusi Bharucha (Deceased)

Bombay HC15 Jun 2016NMT/100/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Notice of motion passed by a single judge of the High Court at Bombay, Testamentary & Intestate Jurisdiction, declaring Petitioner 2 as the sole executor of the Estate and permitting operation of specific bank accounts. The matter was not contested.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner declared as Sole Executor; permitted to operate specific bank accounts singly.

Perviz Nariman Hathidaroo and Anr. Vs Roda Rusi… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

916-NMT100-16.DOC

¶2

ATUL

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 100 OF 2016

¶4

IN

¶5

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 748 OF 2009

¶6

Roda Rusi Bharucha…Deceased
And
Perviz Nariman Hathidaroo & Another…Petitioners

¶7

Mr. C.G. Gavnekar, i/b Mr. G.S. Hiranandani, for the Petitioners.

¶8

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 15th June 2016

¶9

PC:-

¶10

1.The Applicant was original Petitioner No. 2 in this Petition
for probate. The 1st Petitioner, Perviz Nariman Hathodaroo, has
passed away. The application is to permit the 2nd Petitioner to
continue as the sole executor and for reliefs relating to the operation
of certain bank accounts. The matter is not contested.

¶11

2.The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer
clauses (a), (b), (I) and (c), which read as follows:
“(a)the Applicant (Original Petitioner No. 2) be
declared as the Sole Executor entitled to

¶12

Page 1 of 2
15th June 2016

¶13

916-NMT100-16.DOC

¶14

administer the estate of the Deceased as per her
Will dated 1st August 2007;

¶15

(b)the Applicant (Original Petitioner No. 2) be
permitted to operate Bank Account and deal with
estate of the Deceased as Sole Executor for Items
11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 of Schedule 1 (Valuation of
Movable and Immovable Properties of the
Deceased):

¶16

I.To operate solely Savings Bank A/c. No.
0283010091181 in United Bank of India, Peddar
Road Branch, Mumbai being the sole surviving
Executor named in Will dated 1st August 2007 of
the deceased above named Roda R. Bharucha.

¶17

(c)To deal with the amounts standing to the
credit of the Deceased in the above mentioned
Savings Bank Account which was being operated
jointly with Late Joint Executor Perviz Nariman
Hathodaroo as per the Will of the deceased dated
1st August 2007 and the same be allowed to be
operated singly by the present Applicant (Original
Petitioner No. 2);”

¶18

3. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

¶19

(G. S. PATEL, J.)

¶20

Page 2 of 2
15th June 2016

Perviz Nariman Hathidaroo and Anr. v. Roda Rusi Bharucha (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Perviz Nariman Hathidaroo and Anr. v. Roda Rusi Bharucha (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nawman M.H. Malik Vs Essel Group and 2 Ors.

Mahendra Chunilal Patel Vs M/S. F S K Enterprises and and Ketan Shah

Mahendra Chunilal Patel Sole Prop of Patel Products Vs Sanket Food Products (P) Ltd.

Ezeego One Travel and Tours Ltd. Vs Le Travenues Technology Private Ltd.

M/S. Vhb Life Sciences Ltd. Vs M/S. Zaneka Healthcare Ltd. and Anr.

M/S. Vhb Life Sciences Ltd. Vs M/S. Zaneka Healthcare Ltd. and Anr.