Disposed

Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.

Bombay HC23 Mar 2016NMS/2361/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court accepted consent terms settled between Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., approved the undertakings, and disposed of the suit accordingly, directing filing of a board resolution by the defendant.

What did the court decide?

Suit disposed in accordance with consent terms; directions issued for filing board resolution and acting on the order.

Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. — Bombay HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

903-NMS2361-12.DOC

¶2

Shephali

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2361 OF 2012 IN

¶4

SUIT NO. 2449 OF 2012

¶5

…Plaintiff

¶6

Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd.…Plaintiff
Versus
Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.…Defendant

¶7

Mr. Rashmin Khandekar, a/w Mr. Pradeep Mane, Ms. Shruti
Katakey, i/b Crawford Baley & Co., for the Plaintiff.
Mr. A. Daver, i/b Jerome Johnson, for the Defendant.

¶8

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 23rd March 2016

¶9

PC:-

¶10

1.The Suit is settled. Consent Terms are tendered. These are
signed by Ms. Yasna Mathew, Group Product Manger of the
Plaintiff and Mr. Karunaraj Jayseela, Product Manager of the
Defendant as also by their Advocates. The Consent Terms are
taken on record and marked “X” for identification.

¶11

2.I am satisfied that the Consent Terms are in accordance with
law and reflect the correct intention of the parties; and, further, that
they have been drawn and signed by the parties of their own
volition. Accordingly, the undertakings in the Consent Terms are
accepted as undertakings to the Court.

¶12

1 of 2

¶13

903-NMS2361-12.DOC

¶14

3.The Suit is disposed of in accordance with the Consent
Terms. Refund of Court fees, if any, in accordance with Rules.

¶15

4. A copy of the Board Resolution authorising Mr. Jayseela to sign these Consent Terms on behalf of the Defendant will be separately filed in the Registry by Wednesday, 30th March 2016.

¶16

5. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

¶17

(G. S. PATEL, J.)

¶18

2 of 2

Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Uday Rajaram Manjrekar Vs Lovely Vishwas Pednekar (Caveator)

Shri Uday Rajaram Manjrekar Vs Annapurna Arun Kerkar (Caveator)

Shri Uday Rajaram Manjrekar Vs Mangala Vinayak Ajinkya (Caveator)

Dhiren Hareshwar Vaithy Vs Karnav Dhiren Vaithy (Minor)

Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.

Jitendra Singh Rajendra Singh and Ors. Vs Suresh Rajendra Singh Kushwaha