Dismissed
Pure Gold (India) Private Limited v. Pramod Kishanlal Jain
Bombay HCNMIS/44/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
442016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nmis 44-2016.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN INSOLVENCY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 44 OF 2016 IN
INSOLVENCY NOTICE NO. 19 OF 2016
Pramod Kishanlal Jain
...Judgment Debtor
Ex-parte :
Pure Gold (India) Pvt.Ltd.
...Judgment Creditor
Mr.Ramesh C. Jain for Petitioning Creditor. Mr.Vishal Chavan I/b. Lakshmi Murali & Associates for Judgment Debtor.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
6 DECEMBER 2016
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the Judgment Debtor tenders an order passed by the City Civil Court at Bombay on 12 November 2016. By this order, the City Civil Court has set aside the exparte judgment and decree passed on 11 August 2015, based on which the present insolvency notice is issued. Since the exparte decree is set aside, the insolvency notice would not survive and the same ought to be set aside. The notice of motion is accordingly allowed by setting aside the Insolvency Notice No.19/2016.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
S.C. GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court