Disposed

Indukumar Ladhabhai Momaya and 7 Ors. v. Jayantilal Ladhabhai Momaya and 15 Ors.

Bombay HC6 May 2016NMA/858/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order admits a Notice of Motion by condoning a 34-day delay based on affidavit averments. It conditions listing on removal of office objections and numbering of the appeal. No substantive relief or final disposition is recorded. Quality: thin.

What did the court decide?

Notice of Motion made absolute; case listed for admission subject to removal of objections.

Indukumar Ladhabhai Momaya and 7 Ors. Vs Jayantilal… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

NMA-858.15

¶3

ash

¶4

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.858 OF 2015

¶6

IN APPEAL (L) NO. 286 OF 2015 IN TRUST PETITION NO.4 OF 2014

¶7

Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.

¶8

Ms Manisha Khobragade i/b Shri Bharat Mehta for the Applicants. Shri N.K. Jagtap i/b Niranjan Jagtap & Co for the Respondents.

¶9

CORAM : A.S. OKA & P.D. NAIK, JJ DATED : 6TH MAY 2016

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicants and the learned AGP for the Respondents. In view of the averments made in the affidavit in support, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of 34 days. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

¶12

After all office objections in the Appeal are removed and the Appeal is numbered, the same shall be listed for admission on the date fixed as per the CMIS.

Indukumar Ladhabhai Momaya and 7 Ors. v. Jayantilal Ladhabhai Momaya and 15 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indukumar Ladhabhai Momaya and 7 Ors. v. Jayantilal Ladhabhai Momaya and 15 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shakuntala Ramaswamy Vs Tarakkad Ramaswamy Sudhir

Vipul Dattatray Salekar and 13 Ors. Vs the Research Society for the Care Treatment and Training for Children in Need of Special Care and 3

Vilas Kishan Bhoite @ Shamrao Kisan Bhoite and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Kishor Digamabar Gaikwad and Ors. Vs Vaishali Kishor Gaikwad and Anr.

Sumeet Rakesh Khanna and Ors. Vs Reena Sumeet Khanna and Anr.

Shri. Vasant Savaleram Chilap Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary and Ors.