This short order makes a notice of motion absolute in a customs appeal due to reasonable cause shown for procedural non-compliance, granting four weeks to remove objections.
Four weeks' time granted to remove office objections; Notice of Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
9-13-NMA-452.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.452 OF 2016 IN CUSTOMS APPEAL {L} NO.50 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai .... Applicant In the matter between The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai .... Appellant Vs.
M/s. Tullow India Operations Ltd. .... Respondent
Mr. Shyam Walve for the Applicant/Appellant.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : JULY 11, 2016
P.C:
After hearing Mr. Walve, appearing for the applicant, and perusing the affidavit in reply, we are of the view that there is reasonable cause shown for not complying with the procedural Rules. The notice of motion is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Four weeks' time is granted to remove the office objections.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether reasonable cause is shown for not complying with procedural rules to make the notice of motion absolute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai
M/s. Tullow India Operations Ltd.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
