Notice of Motion for condonation of delay in filing. Held: Delay explained sufficiently and reasonably. Motions made absolute. No order as to costs.
Notice of Motions made absolute and requests for condonation of delay granted with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12-NMA210-15.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 210 OF 2015
IN
CROSS OBJECTION (L) NO. 9 OF 2014
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 903 OF 2014
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 211 OF 2015
IN
CROSS OBJECTION (L) NO. 10 OF 2014
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 919 OF 2014 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 212 OF 2015
IN
CROSS OBJECTION (L) NO. 8 OF 2014 IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 904 OF 2014
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 213 OF 2015
IN
CROSS OBJECTION (L) NO. 11 OF 2014
IN
1 of 2
12-NMA210-15.DOC
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 908 OF 2014
Atul Ishwardas Chordia…Appellant
Versus
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
…Respondent
Mr. Niraj Sheth, a/w Mr. P. C. Thripathi, for the Applicant/Appellant
in all Appeals.
Mr. Tejveer Singh,for the Respondents in all Appeals.
CORAM:S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
G.S. PATEL, JJ.
DATED:18th January 2016
PC:-
1.Having perused the Affidavit in Support, we are of the view
that the delay which has occurred has been properly, sufficiently
and reasonably explained, the same stand condoned in each of these
motions.
2.The Notice of Motions are, therefore, made absolute. There
will be no order as to costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
(S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
2 of 2
Atul Ishwardas Chordia
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
S.C. Dharmadhikari
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court