Revenue counsel abandoned the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay and set aside of an impugned appeal order, as the tax effect fell below the threshold prescribed by the CBDT circular, rendering the motion academic.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
8-NMALG-3576.2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION [L] NO.3576 OF 2015 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL [L] NO.1174 OF 2014
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 32, Mumbai .... Applicant In the matter between The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 32, Mumbai .... Appellant Vs. M/s. Bhoomi Developers .... Respondent
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Applicant/Appellant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATED: JANUARY 22, 2016
P.C:
Page 1 of 2
suresh 8-NMALG-3576.2015.doc
Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 rejecting the Appeal.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Page 2 of 2
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 32, Mumbai
M/s. Bhoomi Developers
M.S. Sanklecha
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
