The court condoned a 9-day delay in filing the appeal based on the affidavit in support due to the absence of an affidavit in reply, and made the Notice of Motion absolute.
Delay of 9 days in filing the appeal was condoned; Notice of Motion made absolute; No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-NMA-1435.2016.doc
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1435 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL [L] NO.235 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Central Excise
Large Tax Payer Unit (LTU) .... Applicant In the matter between The Commissioner of Central Excise Large Tax Payer Unit (LTU) …. Appellant Vs. M/s. Tata Motors Ltd. .... Respondent
Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/by M/s. PDS Legal for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 20, 2016
P.C:
For the reasons set out in the affidavit in support and since no affidavit in reply is filed, the delay of 9-days in filing the Appeal is condoned. Notice of motion is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Commissioner of Central Excise Large Tax Payer Unit (LTU)
M/s. Tata Motors Ltd.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
