The Bombay High Court granted a Notice of Motion in Appeal conditioning the conduction of a delay under Section 5 Limitation Act, 1963, finding sufficient cause made out.
Notice of Motion made absolute; delay under Limitation Act, 1963 s. 5 condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
nma-1342-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1342 OF 2016
IN APPEAL (L) NO.46 OF 2016
Manasi Shyamsunder Kelkar v/s
...Applicant
Prashant Gopal Gokhale ...Respondent
Ms.Pradnya V.Dogre i/b Mr.Sachin M.Bondkar for the Applicant. Ms.Swati Gautam for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 2 AUGUST 2016
P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
1/1
Uday.P.Kambli
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the limitation petition is condonable under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manasi Shyamsunder Kelkar
Prashant Gopal Gokhale
A.S. OKA
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
