The High Court of Bombay allowed an application for condonation of delay in filing a Customs Appeal. The delay was justified based on reasons in an affidavit. The Notice of Motion was made absolute, and there was no order as to costs.
The Notice of Motion was made absolute; there was no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA.1176.2015.18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1176 OF 2015 IN CUSTOMS APPEAL (L) NO. 96 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Customs } Import-I } Applicant versus Borsara Machines } Respondent
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the Applicant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G. S. PATEL, JJ.
DATED :- JANUARY 4, 2016
P.C. :-
For the reasons that are set out in the affidavit in support, which, in our opinion, constitute sufficient cause for the delay of 11 days in filing this Appeal, the same is condoned. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). There would be no order as to costs.
(G.S.PATEL, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is shown for condoning a delay of 11 days in filing a Customs Appeal.
Whether the Notice of Motion in Customs Appeal (L) No. 96 of 2015 should be made absolute.
Commissioner of Customs, Import-I
Borsara Machines
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
