This brief order allows a Notice of Motion to condone a 75-day delay in filing a Central Excise appeal, citing the affidavit's sufficient cause, with no order as to costs.
Notice of Motion made absolute; 75-day delay condoned; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA.1113.2015.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1113 OF 2015 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 60 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Central Excise } Applicant versus M/s. Sahakar Shiromani Vasantrao } Kale Sahakari Sakhar karkhana Ltd. } Respondent
Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra for the Applicant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G. S. PATEL, JJ.
DATED :- JANUARY 4, 2016
P.C. :-
For the reasons that are set out in the affidavit in support, which, in our opinion, constitute sufficient cause for the delay of 75 days in filing this Appeal, the same is condoned. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). There would be no order as to costs.
(G.S.PATEL, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
The Commissioner of Central Excise
M/s. Sahakar Shiromani Vasantrao Kale Sahakari Sakhar karkhana Ltd.
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
