Dismissed
Venkatesh Eswaran of Thane v. Neema Venkatesh (Deceased)
Bombay HCMPT/9/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
923-MPT9-16.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 9 OF 2016
Venkatesh Eswaran…Petitioner
And
Neema Ventakesh…Deceased
Mr. Amit Murjani, i/b Hariani & Co., for the Petitioner.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 25th April 2016
PC:-
1.The Petitioner has filed a substantive Testamentary Petition
No. 1722 of 2015 for grant of Letters of Administration. That is
uncontested. That Petition having been filed, this Petition neither
necessary nor proper. This Petition is, therefore, dismissed as
withdrawn with no order as to costs.
2.It is clarified that the dismissal of this Petition will have no
effect on the Testamentary Petition for Letters of Administration.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Venkatesh Eswaran
Neema Ventakesh
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court