Dismissed

Sau. Mandakini Bhaskarrao Jeevankar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Revenue and Forest Deptt., Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC22 Jun 2016MCA/564/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A miscellaneous civil application was rejected as misconceived, holding that Section 24(1)(a) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act applies to proceedings where the award was not made before the Act's commencement, precluding the application of Section 64 for rehabilitation benefits.

What did the court decide?

The miscellaneous civil application was rejected.

Sau. Mandakini Bhaskarrao Jeevankar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Revenue and Forest Deptt., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sau. Mandakini Bhaskarrao Jeevankar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Revenue and Forest Deptt., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sharad S/O Namdeoappa Paraswar Vs Shri. Nandkumar Principal Secretary, Dept of School Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others

Vishal Rice Mill, through Its Proprietor Purushottam M. Dengani, Gadchiroli Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mumbai and 5 Others

M/S Linksons Projects and Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd., through Its Director, Gaurav Y. Sangla and 2 Vs the Authorised Officer, Pusad Urban Co-Op Bank Ltd., Pusad

Jagdish S/O Manikrao Khairkar Vs the Executive Director, Region Iii, Maha. State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., and 2 Others

Shri P.G. Sakhre and 5 Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Department of School Education (Primary), Thr. Its Principal Secretary and 2

M/S. Nagpur Distillers, through Its Managing Partner Vs the State of Maharashtra, through the Department of Urban Devp. Mantralaya and 3 Others