Single-paragraph order disposing of a leave petition. The court granted absolute leave to institute a suit against all respondents without reference to specific legal propositions or detailed findings.
Petition made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) against both respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-LPETN51-16.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION LEAVE PETITION NO. 51 OF 2016
IN
SUIT (L) NO. 188 OF 2016
Ajanta Pharma Limited…Petitioner
Versus
Anchal Lifescience Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.…Respondents
Mr. Ashutosh Kane, a/w Ms. Niyati Davawala, i/b W. S. Kane &
Co., for the Petitioner.
None for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. Kedar Dave, i/b Mr. Kishor Goswami, for Respondent No. 2.
Mr. Bijal Girishchandra Bramhabhatt, partner of the 2nd
Respondent.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:1st April 2016
PC:-
1.For the reasons set out in the Petition, the Petition is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) as against both the
Respondents.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Ajanta Pharma Limited
Anchal Lifescience Pvt. Ltd.
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court