Allowed

Pidilite Industries Ltd. v. Aipl Marketing Pvt.Ltd and Anr.

Bombay HC17 Oct 2016LPETN/14/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Leave petition in a settled suit allowed by consent. Court recorded consent terms signed by parties and their advocates, found them lawful and voluntary, disposed of the suit based on terms, eliminated pending notice, and dispensed with drawn-up decree unless sought later.

What did the court decide?

Leave petition allowed; suit settled on consent terms marked X; undertaking on record; notice of motion disposed; decree dispensation subject to later application.

Pidilite Industries Ltd. Vs Aipl Marketing… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

906-NMS-1660-2016.DOC

¶2

JSN

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION LEAVE PETITION NO. 14 OF 2016

¶4

WITH

¶5

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1660 OF 2016

¶6

IN

¶7

SUIT NO. 417 OF 2016

¶8

Pidilite Industries Limited…Plaintiff
Versus
AIPL Marketing Private Limited and Another…Defendants

¶9

Mr. Hiren Kamod, with Ms. Vrushali Maindad i/b A.A. Desai for the
Plaintiff.

¶10

Mr. Dhiren Karania, i/b G.S. Hegde and V.A. Bhagat for the
Defendants Nos. 1 and 2.

¶11

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 17th October 2016

¶12

PC:-

¶13

1.By consent, the Leave Petition is allowed in terms of prayer
clause (a).

¶14

2.The Suit is settled. Consent Terms are tendered. These are
signed by the authorised signatories of the parties. The authorised
signatories are present in Court. The Consent Terms are also signed
by the Advocates on behalf of the parties.

¶15

Page 1 of 2
17th October 2016

¶16

906-NMS-1660-2016.DOC

¶17

3.Having seen the Consent Terms, I am satisfied that they are
not contrary to law and reflect the parties’ true intentions and have
been drawn by the parties of their own volition.

¶18

4.The Consent Terms are taken are taken on record and marked
“X” for identification. The undertakings in the Consent Terms are
accepted as undertakings to the Court. The Suit is disposed of in
terms of the Consent Terms. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in
accordance with the Rules.

¶19

5.The drawn up decree is dispensed with. However, if for the
purpose of implementation of these Consent Terms, should the
parties require a drawn up decree, they will be entitled to apply to
the Department for one without having to make a separate
application in that behalf and on production of an authenticated
copy of this order. Drawn up decree is to be strictly in accordance
with these Consent Terms only.

¶20

6.In view of this, the pending Notice of Motion does not
survive and is disposed of.

¶21

7. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order.

¶22

(G. S. PATEL, J.)

¶23

Page 2 of 2
17th October 2016

Pidilite Industries Ltd. v. Aipl Marketing Pvt.Ltd and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pidilite Industries Ltd. v. Aipl Marketing Pvt.Ltd and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Trevor Fernandes Vs Tyrone Peter Fernandes

Siyaram Silk Mills Ltd. Vs Sumeet Synfab India Pvt.Ltd.

Naeema W/O of Munir Dilawar Hussain Nizami Vs Meeni D.H. Nizami @ Munir Dilawar Hussain Nizami

Pidilite Industries Ltd. Vs Aipl Marketing Pvt.Ltd and Anr.

Galpha Laboratories Ltd. Vs Bangia Schering and Anr.

Reliance Infrastructure Limited Vs -