Disposed
Prakash Dhanu Patil v. Jagannath Nana Patil and Ors.
Bombay HCLPA/176/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in WP 1657/11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
LPA 176/11 in WP 1657/11
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.176/2011
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1657/2011
Prakash Dhanu Patil & another.
...Appellants..
Versus
Jagannath Nana Patil & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri M.K. Deshpande, Advocate for appellants.
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 15.07.2016
ORDER :
The appellants shall comply with the office
objections within a period of four weeks from today,
failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without
reference to the Court.
(K.L. WADANE, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)
ndk/ c1571625.doc
Prakash Dhanu Patil & another
Jagannath Nana Patil & others
R.M. BOrde
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court