Ratana Prabha Vasant v. Priyanka Vasant Pawar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Bench disposed of a Judges' Order in a petition concerning a fixed deposit receipt formerly held in a minor's name, which she has now attained majority.
The Bench disposed of a Judges' Order in a petition concerning a fixed deposit receipt formerly held in a minor's name, which she has now attained majority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
28.jot-10.16.doc
sbw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGES ORDER NO.10 OF 2016 IN PETITION NO.179 OF 2000
Miss Priyanka V. Pawar ..Applicant And Smt. Ratana P. Vasant ..Petitioner
Mr. R. J. Pareira for the Petitioner.
CORAM: A. K. MENON, J.
DATE : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2016
P.C.:
In view of the fixed deposit receipt being in the name of the
the minor who has since attained majority, the Judges Order is signed separately.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
wadhwa
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to sign the Judges' Order separately in view of the fixed deposit receipt being in the name of the minor who has since attained majority.
Smt. Ratana P. Vasant
Miss Priyanka V. Pawar
A. K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court