Income Tax Appeal not prosecuted by the Revenue, who expressed no interest in continuing the proceedings. The High Court dismissed the appeal on account of non-prosecution despite noting a tax effect of Rs.5.88 lakhs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
905.itxa-867.11.doc
Sbw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.867 OF 2011
Commissioner of Income Tax-IV Pune ..Appellant
Versus
The Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Sangh Maryadit ..Respondent
None for the appellant. Mr.Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent.
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA &
A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2016
P.C.:
appears that the Revenue is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. We note that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is Rs.5.88 lakhs as indicated in para 10 of the appeal memo. This possibly explains the reason why none appears on behalf of the Revenue. In any case we dismiss the appeal on account of non-prosecution.
Commissioner of Income Tax-IV Pune
The Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Sangh Maryadit
M. S. Sanklecha
A. K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
