The appellant did not press the present income tax appeal regarding Assessment Year 2009-10, in view of Circular No. 21 of 2015 issued by the Central Board for Direct Tax. The appeal was consequently dismissed as not pressed.
Court Fees refund as per Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
791-15-itxa=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 791 OF 2015
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-31, Mumbai
Mumbai .. Appellant v/s. Mrs. Zeenat N. Shaikh ..Respondent
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the appellant
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATED : 11th MARCH, 2016.
P.C.
“3:- Henceforth, appeals/SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:-
1 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
791-15-itxa=.doc
| S. No. | Appeals in Income Tax matters | Monetary Limit (in Rs.) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Before Appellate Tribunal | 10,00,000/- |
| 2 | Before High Court | 20,00,000/- |
| 3 | Before Supreme Court | 25,00,000/- |
It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case.”
“10:- This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/ Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed.”
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present appeal should be pressed in view of the Central Board of Direct Tax Circular No. 21 of 2015 discharged.
Whether the present appeal shall be dismissed as not pressed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-31, Mumbai
Mrs. Zeenat N. Shaikh
M.S. SANKLECHA
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
