Dismissed
The Commissioner of INCOME-TAX-11,MUM v. Dr Amin Pathology Laboratory
Bombay HCITXA/648/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
648-08-itxa=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 648 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-11
.. Appellant
v/s.
Dr. Amin's Pathology Laboratory .. Respondent
None for the appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.J. DATED : 19th JANUARY, 2016.
P.C.
in support of the appeal. It appears that the Revenue is not interested in pursuing this appeal. Moreover, we notice that in para 10 of the Appeal Memo, the tax effect involved is Rs. 6.76 lakhs. Therefore, in view of the Central Board of Direct Tax Circular No.21/15 dated 10th December, 2015, the Revenue it seems is not interested in pursuing this appeal.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
1 of 1
Uday S. Jagtap
Commissioner of Income Tax-11
Dr. Amin's Pathology Laboratory
M.S. Sanklecha
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court