The High Court dismissed the revenue appeal, finding no substantial question of law as identical issues were already decided against the Revenue in a different appeal involving the same assessee for a subsequent year.
Appeal dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
592-14-itxa=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 592 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Sharada Erectors Pvt. Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & G.S.KULKARNI, J.J.
DATED : 5th OCTOBER, 2016.
P.C.
1 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
592-14-itxa=.doc
Court in Income Tax Appeal No.680 of 2014. On the above question, this Court by an order dated 3rd October, 2016 found that the identical questions as raised herein did not give rise to any substantial question of law. Thus, did not entertain the appeal.
2 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present appeal gives rise to any substantial question of law in light of a prior identical order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune
M/s. Sharada Erectors Pvt. Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
