Presenting income tax appeal, the Revenue counsel informed the court that the tax effect fell below the threshold limit under CBDT Circular No.21/15, leading to the appeal not being pressed.
The Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ITXA5201.10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5201 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Nashik 422 002 v/s Akruti Group of Companies, Nashik
… Appellant … Respondent
Mr Suresh Kumar i/b Mr Vipul Bajpayee for Appellant. None for Respondent.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA AND B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ. DATE : 29th FEBRUARY, 2016
P.C.:-
1/2
VRD
ITXA5201.10
Appeal.
Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
2/2
VRD
Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Nashik
Akruti Group of Companies
M.S. SANKLECHA
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
