No argument was presented on behalf of the Revenue as they were not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
912.itxa-28.12.doc
Sbw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.28 OF 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax-18 Versus
Birendra M. Sharma
..Appellant
..Respondent
None for the Revenue.
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA & A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2016
P.C.:
This Appeal relates to Assessment block period from 1.4.1990 to
24.12.2000.
wadhwa
Commissioner of Income Tax-18
Birendra M. Sharma
M. S. Sanklecha
A. K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
