The Commissioner of Income Tax- 19 Mumbai v. Vipinchadra M. Jain HUF
Case brief
What is this about?
The developmentally challenged Advocate for the Appellant invoked Circular No.21 of 2015, citing the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs for High Court appeals, to withdraw the appeal. The court noted the tax effect was under Rs. 20 lakhs and dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.