Requesting dismissal of Withdrawn Income Tax Appeal No. 102 of 2014 due to tax effect non-exceeding limit in Revenue's instruction 2015.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed by appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
102-14-itxa=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 102 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Pune
.. Appellant
v/s.
Prakash M. Kudale
..Respondent
Mr. Vipul A. Bajpayee for the appellant
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATED : 11th MARCH, 2016.
P.C.
“3:- Henceforth, appeals/SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:-
1 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
102-14-itxa=.doc
| S. No. | Appeals in Income Tax matters | Monetary Limit (in Rs.) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Before Appellate Tribunal | 10,00,000/- |
| 2 | Before High Court | 20,00,000/- |
| 3 | Before Supreme Court | 25,00,000/- |
It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case.”
“10:- This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/ Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed.”
2 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Pune
Prakash M. Kudale
M.S. Sanklecha
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
