The High Court disposed of Income Tax Reference No. 940 of 1998 as the applicant assessee was not interested in prosecuting the reference. The questions framed were left open for consideration in an appropriate case.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
940-98-ITR=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 940 OF 1998
Pifzer Corporation .. Applicant
v/s.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, City-III, Bombay .. Respondent
None for the applicant
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & S.C. GUPTE, J.J.
DATED : 29th AUGUST, 2016.
P.C.
1961 (the Act) relates to Assessment Year 1980-81.
Reference. It appears that the applicant assessee is not interested in prosecuting the present Reference.
1 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
940-98-ITR=.doc
not already decided.
costs.
(S.C. GUPTE, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pfizer Corporation
Commissioner of Income Tax, City-III, Bombay
M.S. SANKLECHA
S.C. GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
