The applicant presses no opposition to the Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court refuses to answer the framed questions and returns the Reference unanswered, leaving them open for a future attempt.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
898-98-ITR=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.898 OF 1998
M/s. Vulcan Laval Ltd.
.. Applicant
v/s.
The Commissioner of Income Tax .. Respondent Bombay
Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the applicant None for the respondent for respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
DATED : 19th JULY, 2016.
P.C.
1 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
898-98-ITR=.doc
Reference is being returned unanswered. The questions as framed for
our opinion are left open to be considered in an appropriate case, if not already decided.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Vulcan Laval Ltd.
The Commissioner of Income Tax Bombay
M.S. Sanklecha
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
