In this Income Tax Reference filed under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the applicant stated through counsel that he did not wish to press the reference. Consequently, the Bombay High Court returned the reference unanswered without deciding the framed questions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
56-00-ITR=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 56 OF 2000
K.M. Khimsaria .. Applicant v/s. The Commissioner of Income-tax, City-XI, Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr. Ashok Patil for the applicant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. DATED : 5th AUGUST, 2016.
P.C.
costs.
(A.K. MENON, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
1 of 1
Uday S. Jagtap
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Income Tax Reference No. 56 of 2000, filed for Assessment Years 1987-88 and 1988-89, should be adjudicated or returned unanswered due to lack of instructions from the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.M. Khimsaria
The Commissioner of Income-tax, City-XI, Mumbai
M.S. SANKLECHA
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
