M/S. Murphy India Ltd. v. the C.I./T. Bombay.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
43-99-ITR=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 43 OF 1999
M/s. Murphy India Ltd. .. Applicant v/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax City II, Bombay .. Respondent
Mr. B.G. Yewale i/b Rajesh Shah & Co. for the applicant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. DATED : 22nd JULY, 2016.
P.C.
- This Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) relates to Assessment Year 1976-77.
- Mr. Yewale, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant assessee in support of the Reference states that inspite of best efforts he is not receiving any instructions from his client. It appears that the applicant assessee is not interested in pursuing the present Reference.
- In view of the above, the Reference is being returned unanswered. The questions as framed for our opinion are left open to be considered in an appropriate case, if not already decided.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
M/s. Murphy India Ltd.
- respondent
The Commissioner of Income Tax City II, Bombay
Coram
M.S. SANKLECHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Hall and Anderson Limited and Anr. Vs the Assistant Assessor and Collector and 2 Ors.
Enpar Buildcon LLP and Another Vs the Assistant Assessor and Collector and 2 Others
Ramniklal H. Ambani H.U.F. Vs Thec.I.T. Bombay City VI
The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-Iv Mumbai Vs M/S. Nebula Chemicals Ltd.